Proper Use of Entrez-vous in French

The comic strip Non Sequitur  by Wiley Miller held a  Great Non-Sequitur Sign-Off Contest, where readers were invited to send in suggestions for the sign in front of the Au Naturel Deli, behind the door of which lurked a bear with a cleaver. The winning entry, from Mary Cameron of Leander, Texas, had text scrawled on the sign outside that read Entrà ©e:  Vous. Most people might apply a double-entendre to the phrase in this context, which might be translated as Todays Entrà ©e: You.  This is a very cute and clever realization of the comic!  Ã¢â‚¬â€¹ Confusion of Entrà ©e and Entrez But to understand the double-meaning of this suggested comic, the reader would need to understand the  homophonous entrez vous, which is often used by non-native French speakers to mean Come in. So the sign in this comic would be read with a homonymic understanding as both Come in and Todays Main Dish: You.   Language Use Differences The problem is that entrez  vous  in French doesnt quite mean what non-native French speakers use as its literal translation.  When the phrase is broken down, the French verb  entrer is not reflexive; the correct way to say Come in is simply entrez  in the formal and plural you conjugation of the verb. So if the sign in this comic were to indicate that a passerby should enter the shop, itd simply read Entrez, and as a result lose its comedic nature. Neither of these words should be confused with  entre which translates to in or between in English and doesnt have the same pronunciation because the e at the end is essentially silent.  An example of the use of this word might be ...à §a reste entre nous,  meaning this stays between us, perhaps implicative of a confidential conversation.   When to Use Entrez-Vous For non-native French speakers, this begs the question if there is ever an appropriate use of  the phrase entrez vous  in the French language. The only time you might use entrez vous in French would be in the case of a question. Saying Entrez-vous? is similar to asking Are you coming in?  or even What about coming in? and is more casual and conversational in nature.   If youre thinking of using entrà ©e vous or entrez-vous  interchangeably, even for humor, bear in mind that it will likely not be understood by native French speakers as very humorous. Rather, its typically seen as a grammatical error.

About Mary Dyer, Quaker Martyr

Mary Dyer was a  Quaker martyr in colonial Massachusetts. Her execution, and the religious freedom initiatives taken in memory of that, make her a key figure in American religious freedom history.   She was hanged on  June 1, 1660. Mary Dyer Biography Mary Dyer was born in England in about 1611, where she married William Dyer. They emigrated to the Massachusetts colony in about 1635, the year they joined a Boston church. Mary Dyer sided with Anne Hutchinson  and her mentor and brother-in-law, Rev. John Wheelwright, in the Antinomian controversy, which challenged the doctrine of salvation by works as well as challenging  the authority of the church leadership .   Mary Dyer lost her franchise in 1637 for her support of their ideas.   When Anne Hutchinson was expelled from church membership, Mary Dyer withdrew from the congregation. Mary Dyer had given birth to a stillborn child the fall before she left the church, and neighbors speculated that that the child had been deformed as divine punishment for her disobedience. In 1638, William and Mary Dyer moved to Rhode Island, and William helped found Portsmouth.   The family thrived. In 1650, Mary accompanied Roger Williams and John Clarke to England, and William joined her in 1650. She remained in England until 1657 after William returned in 1651.   In these years, she became a Quaker, influenced by George Fox. When Mary Dyer returned to the colony in 1657, she came through Boston, where the Quakers were outlawed. She was arrested and jailed, and her husbands plea led to her release. He had not yet converted, so he was not arrested.   Then she went to New Haven, where she was expelled for preaching about Quaker ideas.   In 1659, two English Quakers were jailed for their faith in Boston, and Mary Dyer went to visit them and to bear witness. She was jailed and then banished on September 12. She returned with other Quakers to defy the law, and was arrested and convicted. Two of her comrades, William Robinson, and Marmaduke Stevenson,   were hanged, but she received a last-minute reprieve when her son William petitioned for her.   Again, she was banished to Rhode Island.  She returned to Rhode Island, then traveled to Long Island. On May 21, 1660, Mary Dyer  returned to Massachusetts to again defy the anti-Quaker law and protest the theocracy that could limit Quakers from that territory. She was again convicted.   This time, her sentence was carried out the day after her conviction. She was offered her freedom if she would leave and remain out of Massachusetts, and she refused.    On June 1, 1660, Mary Dyer was hanged for refusing to comply with anti-Quaker laws in Massachusetts. Mary and William Dyer had seven children. Her death is credited with inspiring Rhode Islands Charter of 1663 granting religious freedom, which is in turn credited with inspiring part of the First Amendment in the Bill of Rights added to the Constitution in 1791. Dyer is now honored with a statue at The State House in Boston. Bibliography The Antinomian Controversy, 1636 - 1638: A Documentary History. David D. Hall, editor.Ingle, H. Larry. First Among Friends: George Fox and the Creation of Quakerism Mary Dyer: Biography of a Rebel Quaker.Larson, Rebecca. Daughters of Light: Quaker Women Preacher and Prophesying in the Colonies and Abroad, 1700-1775Plimpton, Ruth T. Mary Dyer: Biography of a Rebel Quaker

Diversity of People in United States A Threat to U. S. Security Free Essays

I. Introduction As the globalization become rampant, people are migrating to and from different parts of the world. The United States (U. We will write a custom essay sample on Diversity of People in United States: A Threat to U. S. Security? or any similar topic only for you Order Now S.), being a well developed country in the world, apparently, different citizens from different countries and continents are trying to migrate and build their lives in the U.S. This could not only be seen in the modern days but also in the past era of the America wherein French people and African ethnics, from their migrant ancestors, are able to live now as American citizens. Being a divert country; different people are living within one geographical area. Considering that U.S. is a very politicking and powerful country, cold war and gaps with other nations are unavoidable. Along with this study, the main objective of this research is to know whether the culture of diversity in U.S. could be a threat to the national security of the country. Further, the study also aims to provide information regarding the different race and nationality of the people living in the U.S. Also, the purpose of the study is also to determine the implications of having U.S. citizens who are born in different places and nationalities. The study is conducted for the advantage of formulation of mitigating measures if there are negative implications showcased by the study. In addition, the study only encompasses people who are living within the geographic area of the country. It will be conducted in a specified (and short) period of time since the resources of the researchers are also limited. II. Methodology The research study will be using secondary data from the civil registrar and primary data through personal interviews with different professionals (e.g. demographers and sociologists) for thorough analysis of the study. The research design that the researcher will be using is the Experimental design with the combination of the Quasi – experimental design. First, the Experimental design because the study will still follow the scientific method in performing data gathering. Second, the Quasi – experimental design will also be used because of the use of the statistics data and the adherence to lesser random research. The study will also be using cluster random sampling. This sampling method could be more appropriate with the study since subunits of the population that will be gathered will becoming from all states in the U.S. Thus, the study could have an equal representation from each cluster. The method of analysis that will be used in the study is the deductive approach or analysis. From the general information that can be gathered, each thread of details that could contribute significantly to the result of the study. Those data that are planned to collect are data of the migrants since after World War II. The numbers of the natural American citizens The numbers of the natural American citizens will also be counted, meaning, these people are whose parents are both American citizens and born in the U.S. Also, the statistics of the different ethnic, races, and nationalities in different states will also be collected. From the national defense, some security measures will also be searched in addition to the recommendation of the study. III. Results and Discussion (Possible Implication of the Study) There could be many trends from the result and discussions of the study, if it will be conducted completely. There are numbers of implications of the study that could be shown like despite the fact that people in the U.S. are born in different places and nationality, it is not a threat to the national security of the country since the country, itself, has its own tight measure against the terrorism and any violent act to the state. Also, the study could also implies that a tighter security measure should still be implemented within for a safer lives of the U.S. citizens. Reference Retrieved on January 15, 2008 on Embassy of the United States database. How to cite Diversity of People in United States: A Threat to U. S. Security?, Essay examples

ICT and Sustainability Skills and Methods

Question: Discuss about the ICT and Sustainability for Skills and Methods. Answer: Introduction: The ethical scenario that will be described in the study has occurred in the workplace recently. The ethical dilemma is related to breach if ICT (Information Communication and Technology). The company where this ethical dilemma has occurred is an IT small medium enterprise in Australia. The ethical issue is related to breach of data in terms of intellectual property rights. What are the facts? The unethical work can be categorized into privacy and data security. A group of people has sold the business idea of the IT company to another company in exchange of money. Before the company has received the Intellectual Property Right to their idea, the other company has already received it. What are the issues? Hence, due to this breach of data, the company has to face legal litigations from government that it had copied the idea from other company (Patrignani Whitehouse, 2014). It is a type of crime that is done by some group of people against the ethics of intellectual property and more collectively ethics of ICT. The crimes are more in case of SMEs as they cannot afford much security measures while stopping the crimes. Who is affected? There are some lists of people who are responsible for the breach of data regarding to the ethical dilemma in the company. Another IT company has instigated some people in the company to the theft of data. The identification of the ethical issue is not prominently explicit in this case. What is the ethical issue? The IT people that are responsible for securing the data are responsible for the breach and theft of data that is being developed for increasing the popularity of the business among the Australian market. The other people who are related with the data management are indirectly affected by the ethical issue (Eke et al., 2015). Indirectly, the employees of the IT company gets affected by the breach of data. Due to the unethical act, the company has to face much false legislation which affects the career of the people who have no relation with the data theft. What are the implications of the ethical issue? The trust of the person who is heading the team of data management is broken. He is the person who is leading the whole team of data management of the company. It is the responsibility of that person to secure the new business idea that will be implemented in the future for providing perfect solutions to their work. The ideals of honesty and privacy have a role in the ethical decision of the company (Kavathatzopoulos, 2015). The incident has violated the right to privacy and right to property to a great extent regarding the situation. What can be done about it? The ethical incident is related to the breach of confidentiality and ethical standards of ICT in the company. There are various code of ethics in a limited company that the employees are bound to follow. The goal is not to share any business ideas to people outside the company. The code of ethics in terms of data management is breached in this scenario. There are obligations that are related to the ethical dilemma. The obligation that has to be owed is avoiding misleading people while fostering professionalism in the company (Bull, 2015). The ethical infringement is occurred due to the act of few people in the company. What are the options? The company has many obligations that are enlisted in the ethical conduct of data management. The obligations that are included are to produce sound and safe product. The law of ethical issues of confidentiality is being broken by the stakeholders or the group of people in data management. Law of confidentiality and law of data protection in the ethical code of conduct are being broken by this incident that incurs huge loss to the company in legal aspects (Ferguson et al., 2016). Which option is best? The company that instigates the people responsible for data management of this IT company gets benefitted from this incident. The data management people are bribed from the other company in providing the trade secrets i.e. the business idea to them. The IT company is harmed by this action. It gets a false legislation from the court of law when it logged for intellectual property rights. Before this company has completed their idea of doing business, the company that instigates the data protection management has already acquired the intellectual property rights (Muir et al., 2016). It has hampered careers of many other officials related to the data management department of the company. Why the above option is the best? The situation of ethical dilemma in the field of ICT is a breach of law and ethical conduct that can be categorized under the act of utilitarianism. The act of utilitarianism describes that an incident that will increase or decrease the happiness of the affected bodies or parties. In this scenario, the act is the ethical dilemma in ICT. On the contrary, the affected party is the business that is being facing the false legal litigations from the court of law due to false application of intellectual property rights (Stahl et al., 2013). It can be said that this incident decreases the level of happiness of the IT company. It not only hampers the reputation of the company but also the careers of many innocent people.The ethical dilemma in the ICT department of the IT company is a common case of data theft and piracy that is being occurred in most of the small medium enterprises of IT in different parts of the world. Cyber crimes, piracy, breach of data, data theft are common issues faced by these companies due to lack of security aspects. The theory of act utilitarianism illustrates that there is the action can cause one party totally happy and another party in the phase of unethical decision taken by the group of people. A proper understanding should be maintained regarding the ethical conducts of the company and its fatal results that will be occurred on breaching the various sets of ethical codes of conduct. However, it can be said that there is no right or wrong in this situation (Otrel-Cass, 2015). The people responsible for the unethical decision are instigated from outsiders that is also unethical and against the law. References Bull, R. (2015). ICT as an enabler for sustainable development: reflections on opportunities and barriers.Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society,13(1), 19-23. Eke, D. O., Stahl, B. C., Fidler, C. (2015). Understanding the relevance of ethics reviews of ICT research in UK computing departments using dialectical hermeneutics.Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society,13(1), 28-38. Ferguson, S., Thornley, C., Gibb, F. (2016). Beyond codes of ethics: how library and information professionals navigate ethical dilemmas in a complex and dynamic information environment.International Journal of Information Management,36(4), 543-556. Kavathatzopoulos, I. (2015). ICT and sustainability: skills and methods for dialogue and policy making.Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society,13(1), 13-18. Muir, A., Spacey, R., Cooke, L., Creaser, C. (2016). Regulating internet access in UK public libraries: legal compliance and ethical dilemmas.Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society,14(1), 87-104. Otrel-Cass, K. (2015). Commentary: towards more responsibility in ICT.Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society,13(1), 24-27. Patrignani, N., Whitehouse, D. (2014). Slow Tech: a quest for good, clean and fair ICT.Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society,12(2), 78-92. Stahl, B. C., Eden, G., Jirotka, M. (2013). Responsible research and innovation in information and communication technologyidentifying and engaging with the ethical implications of ICTs.Responsible innovation, 199-218.